Get started

Community ideas

Scalping strategy using the RSI 30-50-70 Moving AverageScalping Strategy Using RSI 30-50-70 Moving Average The RSI 30-50-70 Moving Average strategy is designed to help traders identify optimal entry and exit points by using three distinct moving averages, each corresponding to different RSI ranges (30%, 50%, and 70%). These ranges capture varying market conditions—oversold, neutral, and overbought—and provide potential scalping signals. The strategy is flexible, allowing users to adjust RSI ranges, time frames, and periods according to their trading style. Default Indicator Setup: RSI_30 Range (25%-35%): Represents potential oversold conditions (yellow line). Calculated as the moving average of closing prices when the RSI is between 25% and 35%. RSI_50 Range (45%-55%): Represents a neutral or trend-following zone (green line). This range serves as a balanced reference to determine market direction. RSI_70 Range (65%-75%): Represents potential overbought conditions (red line). Calculated as the moving average of closing prices when the RSI is between 65% and 75%. These moving averages allow traders to spot entry and exit points based on the interaction between price and RSI zones. Scalping Entry Strategy: Step 1: Monitor the RSI on the 1-Hour Time Frame Begin by identifying oversold conditions on the 1-hour chart. Wait for the RSI to drop below 30% (or 25% for more volatile assets). Draw a vertical line across the candle that meets this condition. This serves as a visual cue for when to switch to the lower time frame. Step 2: Switch to the 15-Minute Time Frame On the 15-minute chart, look for the price to dip below the RSI_30 moving average (yellow line). This indicates the asset is potentially oversold, presenting an opportunity for a rebound. Ensure that the price movement suggests slowing downward momentum. Step 3: Identify Bullish Divergence Watch for bullish divergence between the RSI (using a 7-period RSI) and the closing price. A divergence occurs when the price makes lower lows, but the RSI makes higher lows, signaling a possible upward reversal. The formation of bullish divergence increases the probability of a successful trade. Step 4: Confirm with the RSI_30 Moving Average Enter a buy order when a green candle’s opening and closing prices are above the RSI_30 line, signaling that the oversold momentum is weakening. Confirm that the RSI_30 moving average has flattened or started to level off. This indicates that the downtrend may be losing steam and that a reversal could be imminent. Important: If the RSI_30 moving average continues to slope downward, it is advisable to wait for it to level off before entering the trade. Patience can help avoid false breakouts. Key Exit Strategies: Take Profit: Consider taking profit when the price reaches the RSI_70 line (overbought zone). In highly volatile markets, consider scaling out of your position gradually as the price approaches this zone. Stop-Loss: Set a stop-loss below the recent swing low or based on the asset’s volatility. A tighter stop might be appropriate for assets with narrow price ranges. Backtesting and Adjustments: Asset-Specific Adjustments: Different assets respond uniquely to RSI-based strategies. For volatile assets (e.g., cryptocurrencies), consider widening the RSI ranges (e.g., 20%-40% for RSI_30 or 60%-80% for RSI_70). For more stable assets (e.g., bonds), tighter ranges (e.g., 30%-50%) may work better. Time Frame Considerations: While this strategy focuses on the 1-hour and 15-minute time frames, some assets may respond better to different periods. Adjust accordingly based on backtesting. Optional Enhancements: Divergence Alerts: Add a bullish divergence detection script to automate alerts when RSI and price diverge, improving timing for entries. Multi-Time Frame Confirmation: To increase trade reliability, consider checking RSI on additional time frames (e.g., 4-hour chart) for more robust signals. Volume Confirmation: Use volume analysis to confirm trade entries. A price reversal coupled with increasing volume strengthens the likelihood of a successful trade.
Education
by DexterMGarcia
7 Ways to Optimize Your Trading Strategy Like a ProYou’ve got a trading strategy—great. But if you think that’s where the work ends, think again. A good strategy is like a sports car: It’s fast, fun, and dangerous… unless you keep it tuned and under control. And given how volatile modern trading is, yesterday’s strategy can quickly become tomorrow’s account-drainer. So, how do you keep your trading strategy sharp and in profit mode? Let’s dive into seven ways to fine-tune your setup like a pro. 1️⃣ Backtest Like Your Profits Depend on It (Spoiler: They Do) Before you let your strategy loose in the wild, backtest it against historical data. It’s not enough to say, “This looks good.” Run the numbers. Find out how it performs over different time frames, market conditions, and asset classes — stocks , crypto , forex , and more. If you’re not backtesting, you run the risk of trading blind — use the sea of charting tools and instruments around here, slap them on previous price action and see how they do. 💡 Pro Tip : Make sure to backtest with realistic conditions. Don’t cheat with perfect hindsight—markets aren’t that kind. 2️⃣ Optimize for Risk, Not Just Reward Everyone gets starry-eyed over profits, but the best traders obsess over risk management. Adjust your strategy to keep risk in check. Ask yourself: How much are you willing to lose per trade? What’s your win-loss ratio? A strategy that promises massive returns but ignores risk is more like a ticking time bomb than a way to pull in long-term profits. 💡 Pro Tip : Use a risk-reward ratio of at least 2:1. It’s simple: risk $1 to make $2, and you’ve got a buffer against losses. Want to go big? Use 5:1 or why not even 15:1? Learn all about it in our Asymmetric Risk Reward Idea. 3️⃣ Diversify Your Strategy Across Markets If you’re only trading one asset or market, you’re asking for trouble (sooner or later). Markets move in cycles, and your strategy might crush it in one but flop in another. Spread your strategy across different markets to smooth out the rough patches. 💡 Pro Tip : Don’t confuse this with over-trading. You’re diversifying, not chasing every pop. 4️⃣ Fine-Tune Your Time Frames Your strategy might be solid on the 1-hour chart but struggle on the 5-minute or daily. Different time frames bring different opportunities and risks. Test your strategy across multiple time frames to see where it shines and where it stumbles. 💡 Pro Tip : Day traders? Shorten those time frames. Swing traders? Stretch ’em out. Find the sweet spot that aligns with your trading style. 5️⃣ Stay Agile with Market Conditions No strategy is perfect for every market condition. What works in a trending market could blow up in a range-bound one. Optimize your strategy to adapt to volatility, volume, and trend shifts. Pay attention to news events , central bank meetings, and earnings reports — they can flip the script fast. 💡 Pro Tip : Learn to identify when your strategy isn’t working and take a step back. Not every day is a trading day. 6️⃣ Incorporate Multiple Indicators (But Don’t Go Overboard) More indicators = more profits, right? Wrong. It’s easy to fall into the trap of loading up your charts with a dozen indicators until you’re drowning in lines and signals. Keep it simple — combine 3 to 5 complementary indicators that confirm your strategy’s signals, and ditch the rest. 💡 Pro Tip : Use one indicator for trend confirmation and another for entry/exit timing. 7️⃣ Keep Tweaking, But Don’t Blow Out of Proportion Here’s the rub: There’s a fine line between optimization and over-optimization. Adjusting your strategy too much based on past data can lead to overfitting — your strategy works perfectly on historical data but crashes in live markets. Keep tweaking, but always test those tweaks in live conditions to make sure they hold up. 💡 Pro Tip : Keep a trading journal to track your tweaks. If you don’t track it, you won’t know what’s working and what’s not. Get familiar with the attributes of a successful trading plan with one of our top-performing Ideas: What’s in a Trading Plan? 💎 Bonus: Never Stop Learning The market’s constantly changing and your strategy needs to change with it. Keep studying, keep testing, and keep learning. The moment you think you’ve mastered the market is the moment it humbles you. Optimizing a trading strategy isn’t a one-and-done deal—it’s an ongoing process. By fine-tuning, testing, and staying flexible, you can keep your strategy sharp, profitable, and ahead of the curve. Optimize smart, trade smart!
SP:SPXEducation
by TradingView
7
How You Can Be Wrong and Still Make Money in TradingIn trading, the concepts of "right" and "wrong" are far more nuanced than they might appear at first glance. Many new traders tend to focus on the binary outcome of individual trades — a win feels "right," while a loss feels "wrong." However, the reality is more complex. You can be "right" in the short term and "wrong" in the long term, and vice versa. Additionally, you can be wrong more often than not and still be profitable, depending on how you manage your risk. Let’s dive into these ideas and explore how you can shift your mindset to become a more successful trader. Short-Term Success vs. Long-Term Gains In trading, it’s possible to make the right decision based on short-term movements but be wrong in the bigger picture. For example, you might catch a bullish breakout on a stock or currency pair, ride the momentum for a quick profit, and exit your trade thinking you were "right." However, the same asset could enter a prolonged downtrend shortly afterward, meaning your initial trade was correct in the short term but wrong in the long-term outlook. Conversely, you could be "wrong" in the short term by entering a trade too early, seeing some losses, but if your broader analysis holds true, you could eventually profit when the market moves in your favor. In these cases, it’s not just about the immediate outcome, but about how your trades fit into the larger trend or strategy. This balance between short-term and long-term thinking is critical. Often, traders lose sight of the bigger picture because they are too focused on short-term fluctuations. Markets move up and down constantly, and understanding the difference between short-term noise and long-term trends is key to sustained profitability. A Real-Life Example: Who Was Right? Let’s illustrate this with a real-world scenario. Imagine you bought Bitcoin in 2021 at $50,000, and after, the price dropped to $15,000. Now, let’s say I sold Bitcoin in 2021 at a high price before the drop. Who was right, and who was wrong? In the short term, I appeared "right" because I made money on my short trade when the price of Bitcoin fell. On the other hand, you seemed "wrong" when the price dropped to $15,000, significantly below your purchase price. But fast forward to today. Bitcoin's price has risen again, and you’re now back in profit on your long-term trade. So, were you wrong? No — you held through the bearish cycle, and over time, your patience paid off. In this case, both of us were right depending on the time frame. This example highlights the importance of understanding the context of "right" and "wrong" in trading. The outcome of a trade can vary depending on your time horizon and strategy. What might seem like a losing position in the short term could turn into a winning trade over the long term. The Role of Time Horizon and Stop Losses I sometime receive comments from people claiming I was "wrong" when I make a prediction about an asset going up or down, only for the price to move in the opposite direction in the immediate instance. What many don’t consider is my time horizon or where my stop loss is set. Every trade comes with a planned strategy: an entry, a time horizon, and most importantly, a stop loss. Without understanding these elements, it's easy to jump to conclusions about whether a trade is "right" or "wrong." A trade may appear wrong at first, but it’s only truly wrong if it hits my stop loss or fails within my intended timeframe. It’s crucial for traders to remember that the market doesn't move in straight lines. Prices fluctuate, and often, the noise of daily movements can make it seem like a trade is going against you before it eventually turns around. This is why having a clear strategy, including a stop loss and a well-defined time horizon, is essential for long-term success. It’s not about getting every trade right in the short term — it’s about managing the bigger picture. A Recent Example: Right or Wrong? Let’s look at a more recent example. This week, Gold dropped by 400 pips at one point. I catched part of this move, made money during the drop, and took my profits. However, Gold is now trading slightly above the price where it started at the beginning of the week. Meanwhile, a friend of mine remained strongly bullish, expecting Gold to eventually break $2700 — and it seems like he will be right at this moment. So, who was right, and who was wrong? The truth is, we were both right. I made money on a short-term drop, while my friend may see profits from his medium-term bullish outlook. The key takeaway here is that different trading styles can yield profitable outcomes even when the direction of the trade appears contradictory. This example highlights the importance of understanding what type of trader you are: Are you a short-term trader looking to capitalize on daily moves? A swing trader aiming for mid-term profits? Or a long-term investor waiting for broader trends to unfold? Each approach requires a different mindset, strategy, and time horizon. The Power of Risk-Reward Ratios One of the most critical principles in trading is managing your risk. Many traders believe that to be successful, they need to win more than they lose. However, this isn’t necessarily true. You can be wrong six out of ten times and still make money if your risk-to-reward ratio is favorable. For instance, with a risk-reward ratio of 1:2, every time you risk $1, you aim to make $2 in profit. If you take ten trades and lose six, you might lose $6. But if you win the remaining four trades and each nets you $2 in profit, you make $8. That leaves you with a net profit of $2, even though you were "wrong" more often than you were "right." This approach emphasizes the importance of managing risk over being correct on every trade. The lesson here is that it's not about how often you're right but how much you make when you're right and how little you lose when you're wrong. Having a sound risk management strategy, such as a 1:2 or higher risk-reward ratio, can help you remain profitable even with a lower win rate. Embracing the Reality of Losses In trading, losses are inevitable. Even the best traders in the world lose money on some portion of their trades. The key is how you handle those losses. Many novice traders fall into the trap of believing that every loss is a failure, leading to frustration and emotional decision-making. In reality, losses are just part of the process. The most successful traders understand that losing trades is also part of their strategy. They manage their losses by sticking to a disciplined approach, cutting losing trades quickly, and letting winners run. They don’t let a few wrong trades derail their confidence or strategy. This is where having a clear plan and sticking to your risk-reward parameters is crucial. Shifting Your Mindset To succeed in trading, you need to shift your mindset from focusing on being right or wrong on individual trades to thinking in terms of probabilities and long-term success. Trading isn’t about having a 100% success rate — it’s about having a consistent edge and managing risk effectively. If you can accept that losses are part of the journey and focus on maintaining a favorable risk-reward ratio, you'll find that being "wrong" on trades won’t prevent you from being profitable overall. The key is to stay disciplined, stick to your plan, and always think about the bigger picture. Conclusion: Redefining Right and Wrong in Trading In the end, the concepts of right and wrong in trading are more fluid than they initially seem. You can be wrong more often than you're right and still be profitable, provided you manage your risk and maintain a favorable risk-reward ratio. Similarly, you can be right in the short term but wrong in the long term or vice-versa and still make money. The next time you analyze a trade, remember: success isn't about being right on every trade, but about managing your trades wisely and thinking in terms of probabilities. Trading is a marathon, not a sprint, and understanding the balance between short-term outcomes and long-term success is what separates the average traders from the truly successful ones. Best of luck! Mihai Iacob
BINANCE:BTCUSDEducation
by Mihai_Iacob
4
How to Adam & Eve PatternEver wondered about Adam and Eve in trading? It's a straightforward and powerful pattern. Hello dear traders! If you like my graphics, please use Like button 💙💛 Picture Adam as the first market peak or dip, and Eve as the second, forming a U-shape. This pattern highlights a robust price level, suggesting a potential market shift. How to Utilize It? In a downtrend, spot Adam and Eve as double bottoms. When Eve follows Adam, indicating a strong support level, consider entering trades. Trade when the price breaks above resistance line, with a stop loss set at the neckline level. Pay attention to trading volumes. They confirm buying or selling strength, offering a clear signal for a trend reversal. Finding Your Target: Identify the pattern's height from the neckline to the peak of Eve. Project this distance downward from the breakout point for a bullish pattern or upward for a bearish one. This gives you a potential target for your trade. Here is an example of Adam & Eve pattern play on Bitcoin chart: Master the Adam and Eve pattern to make confident trading decisions. It's an intuitive way to identify market change in trend and make strategic moves. 📈✨
INDEX:BTCUSDEducation
by ArShevelev
9
New indicator with a better Weekday Highlight capability Weekday Highlighter (ICT) This Indicator can be used across all assets (Crypto, Forex, Stocks, ETFs...). The Weekday Highlighter will be handy while trader analyze an asset using ICT-SMC methodology to understand AMD cycle (Accumulation, Manipulation, Distribution) which is crucial for understanding weekly candle patterns Why this Indicator? I did try few available indicators in trading view that are used to highlight weekday. They do work fine, but has few problems like the ones that I have mentioned below. This being a straight forward script and does not have any complex logics underneath, I gave a shot to just address that and added features that are good to have. • Other Indicators just Highlights the selected weekday in the main chart. However, it would still be amidst the clutter of other candles. • Weekday Highlighter (ICT) Indicator just refines those candles that are “Selected” on to a separate pane thus mitigating visual discomfort, moreover enhances this option to highlight with different colors for different days as needed. • As a good to have feature I tried to show the selection done in the input screen and furnish in a tidy Table. • I do respect traders choice and their inclination towards having different table position or Alignment and Size. Hence added the same. • You can also disable this table display from the style tab in settings popup. I have planned to add few more features in future on this script, stay tuned. I am also creating few more scripts similar to this one and scripts on other concepts to find dynamic Levels, Screeners etc. Please reach out to me for Queries on this script or new script creation requests. Learn More, Trade safe, Earn More...
NASDAQ:AAPLEducation
by LUCARYC
TRADINGVIEW: Is it really worth the money?DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in this brief post are entirely my own. It is not intended as a sales pitch or investing advice of any kind. I no longer subscribe to any social media platforms. I do not have the time to engage in and contribute to these platforms. My family and close friends know how to reach me. It does not mean that I do not understand the immense power that these platforms exert on our daily lives. However, over the last week I’ve had some interesting, yet cordial exchanges with other traders on TradingView about my ideas. And then it struck me: I am back on social media but this experience is very different. It brings me to my headline. YES, TradingView is worth every penny of the subscription fee, no matter which level you subscribe to. When I started trading in 2003, I was paying $150 per month for a charting package. I do not have to extoll the virtues of the incredible resources available on the platform. You should all know that. Do yourself a favor, instead of staring at a chart for hours on end, do some deep diving into what the platform has to offer on the technical side, the customization features and the news resources. THE REAL WORTH OF THIS TRADING PLATFORM IS THAT AS A SOLO TRADER, ONE HAS THE BACKING OF 60M+ USERS TO EXCHANGE IDEAS WITH IN ADDITTION TO THE BEST INSTITUTIONAL CONTRIBUTORS ON THE PLANET. In addition, the moderators do an excellent job by keeping the platform civil and informative. In conclusion, as an individual trader, do not feel alone. By all means, reach out and connect with other traders to exchange ideas. Above all, use the vast resources on this platform and the internet to educate yourself. Or pay for someone to coach you. Your decision. That is how we become informed and successful traders. But kindly refrain from the vitriol I have noticed on some of the Minds exchanges. Thanks for reading and good luck with NFP tomorrow.
Education
by jvrfxalerts
Example of Conditions for Starting Trading Hello, traders. If you "Follow", you can always get new information quickly. Please also click "Boost". Have a nice day today. ------------------------------------- I will publish in advance due to an external schedule tomorrow. Accordingly, I will take time to provide additional explanations on the ideas published today. ---------------------------------------- I will talk about the basis for indicating the direction of progress shown in the chart above. In order to differentiate from other people's analyses, I am trying to explain the basis for indicating the support and resistance points or sections on the chart. I think that if you understand why those points and sections were set, you will eventually be able to understand them without having to read the explanation all the way through. For this, more support and resistance points are needed. This is because we can select the volatility period by additionally drawing the trend line. However, since all of these processes are displayed on the chart, there are many complaints that the chart is messy and confusing, so we are trying to reduce them as much as possible. Therefore, there are cases where the chart is displayed in two versions. The chart below is a chart that shows many support and resistance points and draws a trend line to select the volatility period. Therefore, since the support and resistance points may be displayed differently, it is recommended that you refer to the points or sections that I have written. - The conditions for starting a transaction are simpler than they look. However, when these conditions are met, the support and resistance points drawn on the 1M, 1W, and 1D charts must be displayed. Therefore, even if the conditions for starting a transaction are met, if the support and resistance points are not displayed at the corresponding price, you cannot start a transaction. Please read this carefully and thank you. - (It would be good to see this as an example of how to find the conditions that fit you and how to utilize them.) Conditions for starting a transaction are 1. Buying time conditions - When the StochRSI indicator rises in the oversold range and maintains the state of StochRSI > StochRSI EMA - When the BW indicator forms a horizontal line at the lowest point (0) - When the OBV indicator rises below the 0 point - When the DMI indicator rises below the 0 point 2. Selling time conditions - When the StochRSI indicator falls in the overbought range and maintains the state of StochRSI < StochRSI EMA - When the BW indicator forms a horizontal line at the highest point (100) - When the OBV indicator falls above the 0 point - When the DMI indicator falls above the 0 point When the above conditions are met, check whether there is support at the support and resistance points drawn near the price. Confirmation is used to proceed with the transaction. The current price position is 60672.0-61099.25. Therefore, you can proceed with the transaction depending on whether there is support in this section. Since it is currently falling below 60672.0, there is nothing you can do in spot trading other than cutting losses. In futures trading, you can enter with a sell (SHORT) position. - It is rare for all the conditions for starting a transaction mentioned above to be met. Therefore, it is recommended to basically check whether the BW indicator forms a horizontal line at the lowest point (0) or highest point (100), and then proceed with the transaction by checking the movement of the StochRSI indicator. Also, it is recommended to select a split sell section to make a profit by calculating the fluctuation range while checking the strength of the rise or fall with OBV and DMI. - In summary of the above, Since the StochRSI indicator has not yet risen from the oversold zone and StochRSI < StochRSI EMA, it is recommended to check whether a reversal is occurring. Also, you should check whether the BW indicator has fallen to the lowest point (0) and formed a horizontal line. If the OBV and DMI indicators rise below the 0 point without meeting these conditions, you should proceed with an aggressive purchase (a transaction that requires a quick response similar to scalping or day trading). If you do not proceed with an aggressive purchase, you should wait. - It is not a good idea to enter a current sell (SHORT) position in futures trading. However, if you proceed with an aggressive transaction (scalping or day trading), you can start trading. The reason why it is not a good condition for trading is because the price is located in the 1. purchase timing condition section among the conditions for starting a transaction mentioned above. Therefore, the profit is small or you may even suffer a loss. - If you are not currently trading, I think the section where you should trade is when it rises around 61K. Before that, it is highly likely that you will not be able to purchase because it seems like it will fall further. I think this point, or the section where you actually trade, is the psychological volume profile section. This psychological volume profile section is the section where psychology applies that you must trade even now. Since this point is ultimately a low or high point, it is a section where you are likely to incur losses if you purchase. The 61K section that I mentioned earlier is a section where it is highly likely to be a low point, so it is a section where you are likely to incur losses if you cut your loss or enter a sell (SHORT) position. - If it shows resistance near 60672.0, there is a possibility that a sharp decline will occur momentarily and touch 59K and then rise. This phenomenon can be a fake or a sweep movement, so you need to be careful. In order to avoid losses from this phenomenon, auxiliary indicators are necessary. Since auxiliary indicators are lagging, they are unlikely to show large movements in sudden price fluctuations. - What I am talking about is not a method of chart analysis, but an example of how to set a standard for trading. Therefore, I hope you do not misunderstand the above as about chart analysis. Since chart analysis and trading are different, what you see on the chart is also different. In order to complement this difference, what is needed is the support and resistance points drawn on the 1M, 1W, and 1D charts. Since charts without support and resistance points are likely to be for chart analysis, there is no need to try to find a trading point on these charts. - Have a good time. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------- - ​​Big picture It is expected that the real uptrend will start after rising above 29K. The section expected to be touched in the next bull market is 81K-95K. #BTCUSD 12M 1st: 44234.54 2nd: 61383.23 3rd: 89126.41 101875.70-106275.10 (overshooting) 4th: 134018.28 151166.97-157451.83 (overshooting) 5th: 178910.15 These are points where resistance is likely to be encountered in the future. We need to see if we can break through these points. We need to see the movement when we touch this section because I think we can create a new trend in the overshooting section. #BTCUSD 1M If the major uptrend continues until 2025, it is expected to start by creating a pull back pattern after rising to around 57014.33. 1st: 43833.05 2nd: 32992.55 -----------------
Education
by readCrypto
A Simple and Effective Strategy to Outsmart Liquidity HuntingHave you ever encountered a scenario where the price hits your Stop Loss level first, only to then fully reverse and head in the direction of your target profit, ultimately reaching it? If the answer is yes, you’ve most likely fallen victim to what is commonly referred to as a 'liquidity grab'. In other terms, this phenomenon is known as 'stop-loss hunting', and it is an inescapable occurrence within the realm of trading. But why does it happen? The answer lies in the actions of big market players, such as banks and institutions, who need to fill their large positions. Simply put, for markets to function properly, there must be equilibrium - an equal number of buyers and sellers, a balance between supply and demand. For every buy-back and sell-off you conduct, there must be an opposing party willing to execute the trade with you. This is where brokers come into play, linking both sides of the transaction. When there is an imbalance between buyers and sellers, it leads to market inefficiency, which can result in excess supply or demand, distorting price movements. Market makers help prevent this by ensuring market stability and securing better pricing for executing large orders.
 For example, imagine you have analysed the sentiment and opened a SELL trade on USD/CHF at a key level, placing your Stop Loss just above the same zone. After some time, you notice the price impulsively moves towards your Stop Loss, triggering it and taking you out of the trade. Later, you watch the price flip and move in the direction you had originally predicted. Frustrated, you begin to blame the market, convinced it’s rigged against you. However, what really happened is that the price was pushed into an obvious pool of Stop Losses, allowing the positions you and many others sold to be bought back. This also enabled large institutional orders to be filled at better prices, while maintaining balance between buy and sell orders. How do you avoid this? The key is to better understand market dynamics and make more informed decisions. In this scenario, a smarter approach would have been to place your entry where the obvious pool of Stop Losses is located. By doing so, you could have captured a more favourable risk-to-reward ratio, perhaps achieving a 1:3 trade, as illustrated in the accompanying chart. So next time, before rushing into a trade, take a step back. Assess the situation with greater patience and clarity. Often, there’s an initial push, just as the price action indicates. This move entices traders into premature entries. Afterward, a sudden liquidity grab occurs, wiping out these traders before the market reverses in the anticipated direction. Be patient. Play it smart. Best wishes, Investroy
Education
by Investroy
Taking a look at Fibonacci in Technical AnalysisIn the world of technical analysis, traders are always searching for tools that provide an edge in the markets. One such tool, which has stood the test of time, is Fibonacci retracement. Derived from a series of numbers discovered by the Italian mathematician Leonardo Fibonacci in the 13th century, the Fibonacci sequence has been applied to various fields, from nature to finance, and plays a significant role in predicting market movements. This blog will explore how Fibonacci retracement works, why it’s relevant for traders, and how you can incorporate it into your trading strategy for better results. ________________________________________ What is Fibonacci? The Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones, starting with 0 and 1. So, the sequence looks like this: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, and so on. The magic of Fibonacci for traders lies in the ratios derived from this sequence, which are commonly referred to as the "Golden Ratios." The most important Fibonacci ratios used in technical analysis are: • 61.8% (also known as the Golden Ratio) • 38.2% • 23.6% These ratios are used to identify potential levels of support and resistance in the price of a financial asset. Fibonacci Retracement in Trading Fibonacci retracement is a popular technical analysis tool used to find potential levels where price pullbacks or reversals might occur. The idea is simple: when a market moves sharply in one direction, it’s likely to retrace part of that move before continuing in the same direction. Key Levels in Fibonacci Retracement: • 61.8%: Often regarded as the "golden retracement level," this ratio is believed to be the strongest predictor of price reversal points. • 50%: Although not an official Fibonacci ratio, traders frequently use this level to gauge whether the trend will resume or reverse. • 38.2% and 23.6%: These levels represent smaller pullbacks and often signal short-term corrections. By plotting these levels on a price chart, traders can get a better sense of where the price might pause, reverse, or find support/resistance. How to Use Fibonacci Retracement in Your Trading Strategy Let’s break down how Fibonacci retracement works in practice. Step 1: Identifying a Trend The first step in using Fibonacci retracement is identifying a strong upward or downward trend. This could be a swing high to swing low (in an uptrend) or a swing low to swing high (in a downtrend). The trend is essential because Fibonacci retracement levels are applied to find where pullbacks might occur during this trend. Step 2: Plotting Fibonacci Levels Once you’ve identified the trend, plot the Fibonacci retracement levels using the highest and lowest points of the move. Most charting platforms, have built-in Fibonacci tools to help with this. For example, in an uptrend, select the lowest point (swing low) and drag the tool to the highest point (swing high). The software will automatically calculate and plot the key Fibonacci levels: 23.6%, 38.2%, 50%, 61.8%, and 100%. Step 3: Analysing the Price Action Now that the Fibonacci levels are in place, watch how the price interacts with these levels. If the price retraces to 38.2% or 61.8%, it might find support and continue moving in the direction of the trend. Traders often look for other confirmation signals (such as candlestick patterns, volume spikes, or moving averages) at these levels before making a trade. Using Fibonacci in Conjunction with Other Indicators While Fibonacci retracement is a powerful tool on its own, its effectiveness increases when combined with other technical analysis tools. Here are some common pairings: • Moving Averages: A bounce off a Fibonacci level that coincides with a key moving average (like the 50-day or 200-day MA) is often seen as a strong buy or sell signal. • Trendlines: If a Fibonacci retracement level aligns with a major trendline, this increases the likelihood of the level acting as strong support or resistance. • Candlestick Patterns: Reversal patterns like Doji, Hammer, or Engulfing candles at a Fibonacci retracement level can provide additional confirmation for your trade setup. • RSI/Other Oscillators: Overbought or oversold conditions shown by the Relative Strength Index (RSI) around a Fibonacci level can signal potential price reversals. On the USD/JPY weekly chart we have an engulfing pattern and a diverging RSI at the 61.8% which adds weight to the idea that the market was likely to hold in this vicinity and recover. Conclusion: Fibonacci as a Core Tool in Your Trading Arsenal Fibonacci retracement is a versatile and widely trusted tool that can help traders identify potential price reversal levels. By understanding how to apply Fibonacci ratios and combining them with other technical indicators, you can improve your chances of success in the markets. Remember, no tool is perfect, and using Fibonacci retracement effectively requires practice and confirmation. Incorporate it into a broader trading strategy, and you’ll be able to make more informed and profitable trading decisions. Disclaimer: The information posted on Trading View is for informative purposes and is not intended to constitute advice in any form, including but not limited to investment, accounting, tax, legal or regulatory advice. The information therefore has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. Opinions expressed are our current opinions as of the date appearing on Trading View only. All illustrations, forecasts or hypothetical data are for illustrative purposes only. The Society of Technical Analysts Ltd does not make representation that the information provided is appropriate for use in all jurisdictions or by all Investors or other potential Investors. Parties are therefore responsible for compliance with applicable local laws and regulations. The Society of Technical Analysts will not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any information on this site.
Education
by The_STA
Dangerous Lies Your Backtest TellsDangerous Lies Your Backtest Tells We are easily hooked on the dopamine rush of seeing profitable equity curves during backtesting. The allure of parabolic returns is often so strong it is blinding to the inherent flaws that exist, to varying degrees, in every backtest. Backtesting, while often seen as an essential step in designing and verifying trading strategies - is far from a foolproof method. Many traders place too much confidence in their backtested results, only to see their strategies fail when used in the live markets. The reality is that backtesting is riddled with limitations and biases that lead to a false sense of security in a strategy’s effectiveness. Let’s take a comprehensive look into the many flaws of backtesting, and explore the common pitfalls of using a simple back test as your only method of verifying a strategy's efficacy. 1. Choosing the Winning Team After the Game is Already Over (Selection Bias) When selecting which instruments for backtesting, it is common to choose assets you are already interested in or those that performed well in the past. This introduces selection bias, as the strategy is tested on assets that may have been outliers. While this may produce impressive backtest results, it creates an illusion of reliability that may not hold up when applied to other assets or future market conditions - a theme that will be common for most of the explored backtesting drawbacks. Example: Imagine backtesting a Long only strategy using only tech stocks that surged during a market boom. The strategy might look incredibly successful in the backtest, but when applied to other sectors or different market phases it will most likely fail to perform - because the selection was based on past winners rather than a broader, more balanced approach. 2. You Only See the Ships that Make it to Shore (Survivorship Bias) Similar to the above, survivorship bias occurs when backtests only include assets that have survived of the test period - excluding those that were delisted, went bankrupt, or failed entirely. This creates a skewed dataset, inflating performance metrics beyond reasonable levels once again. By only focusing on assets that are still around, you overlook the fact that many others didn’t make it - and these failures could have significantly impacted the strategy’s results. By ignoring delisted companies, or rug-pulled crypto projects, you inherently induce a selection bias - as purely because your chosen instruments didn’t go to zero they must have performed better. Example: Suppose you backtest a low-cap cryptocurrency strategy. If your backtest spans for, say, five years the test can give the illusion of success - but what’s missing is the hundreds of tokens that were launched and failed during the same period. How can we possibly assume that we will be lucky enough to only pick tokens that survive the next five years? 3. Reading Tomorrow’s News Today (Look-Ahead Bias) Look ahead bias occurs when future information is unintentionally used in past decision making during a backtest. This can often occur due to coding errors in an automated system which leads to unreasonable and unrepeatable results. Look-ahead bias isn’t limited to algorithmic backtesting - it can also affect manual backtests. Traders will often miss false signals because they can already see the outcome of the trade. This knowledge of the future can affect the accuracy of a manual backtest - both as a conscious decision by the trader but also subconsciously. if Current_Price < Tomorrows_Close strategy.entry("Enter a Long Position", strategy.long) // An extreme example 4. Perfecting the Final Chord, but Forgetting the Song (Recency Bias) Recency bias occurs when traders place too much emphasis on the most recent data or market conditions in a backtest. This usually occurs when a trader feels they missed an opportunity in the past few months - and tries to develop a strategy that would have captured that specific move. By focusing too heavily on recent history, it is easy to neglect the fact that markets usually move in long cyclical phases. This over optimisation for recent conditions will, at best, result in a strategy that performs well in the short term but fails as soon as market dynamics shift. Example Frustrated by missing the most recent leg of the bull market, a trader develops a strategy that would have perfectly performed during this period. However, when the trader begins live trading at the top of the market, the strategy quickly fails. It was only optimized for that short and specific market phase and was unable to adapt to the changing market conditions. 5. Forcing the Square into the Round Hole (Overfitting) Overfitting occurs when a strategy is excessively optimized for historical data, capturing noise and random fluctuations rather than meaningful patterns. Overfitting is common when traders test too many parameter combinations, tweaking their strategy until it fits the past data perfectly. In contrast to the previous point, this over optimisation can occur on data of any length, whether years or even longer periods. Example Adjusting a large range of parameters in a high frequency strategy by incredibly small increments and deciding to use the calibrations that yield the highest performance. 6. Mixing Oil and Water (Conflating Trend and Mean Reversion Systems) Traders often attempt to design strategies that perform well in both trending and mean reverting environments, which leads to muddled logic and poor performance in ALL environments. A trend following strategy is meant to capitalize on sustained price movements, and should naturally underperform during mean-reverting or ‘ranging’ periods. In a range-bound market, a trend-following strategy will often buy near the top of the range after detecting strength, only for the price to reverse. Conversely, a mean reversion strategy is built to profit from oscillations around a stable point and forcing both approaches into a single system results in unrealistic backtest performance and poor real-world results. One of the common mistakes is when a trend following strategy ‘accidently’ performs well during mean-reverting periods. This skews the backtest metrics because any gains during non-trending markets are multiplied significantly during actual trends. As a result, the backtest shows artificially positive performance - but the strategy quickly falls apart in live trading. Normally, a trend following strategy would incur losses during a range-bound market and only begin to recover once a new trend emerges. However, if a strategy is overfit to handle both the trend and mean reversion periods of the past, it doesn’t need to recover losses and instead compounds gains during the entire trend. This creates inflated backtest results that won’t hold up in real trading. Example: A trader develops a trend following system that, through over-optimization, performs surprisingly well during mean-reversion phases. In the backtest, the strategy shows strong returns, even in ranging markets. However, in live trading, the system fails, leaving the trader with poor performance. Instead, the trader should have accepted ‘lower’ returns from a strategy that wasn’t overfit - because in live markets robust strategies with mediocre backtests perform better than overfit strategies that only excel in backtesting. 7. Seeing the World Through a Keyhole (Limited Data Skewed by Outliers) Strategies built on assets with limited data are highly susceptible to skew results, especially when outliers dominate the dataset. Without sufficient data, it becomes nearly impossible to assess whether a strategy can consistently perform into the future. Some strategies, like trend following, are designed to capture outliers, that is, the periods of performance above the norm. The issue arises when testing on a small sample as it’s difficult to determine if the strategy can consistently capture trends or just got lucky. Example: A trader develops a trend following strategy for a cryptocurrency that has recently launched. The backtest shows massive gains, as it is common for projects to make large returns as soon as they are listed. However without enough data history, it is impossible to assess the actual effectiveness of this strategy, as its performance metrics are positively skewed by the ‘listing pump.’ The image shows a cryptocurrency project launched in October 2020. At first glance, the EMA Crossover strategy appears profitable, but a closer look reveals that most of the profit comes from the first trade, which is considered an outlier. If that trade was removed, the strategy as a whole would become unprofitable. Following this strategy is essentially betting on the project to experience another sharp rise similar to what occurred in 2020. While technically this isn’t impossible, it is much riskier - a more proven and verified strategy would increase your probability of success. 8. Designing a Car that Doesn’t Fit on the Road (Execution Constraints and Positions Sizing) In backtesting, real world constraints such as minimum or maximum order sizes are often ignored, leading to unrealistic trade execution. Traders may find that they either don’t have enough capital to satisfy the minimum order size - either immediately or after a small drawdown. Additionally, compounded returns on a backtest can lead to absurd positions sizes that could never be bought or sold in the real market. This particularly is more problematic for deep backtestests. Example: A backtest shows spectacular growth, with the account size ballooning overtime and resulting in an extremely high profit percentage. However, in real-word conditions, the required position size to continue executing the strategy becomes so large that it exceeds the liquidity of the market - making it impossible to receive comparable profit percentages on real world trading. 9. Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts (Not Accounting for Fees, Commissions and Slippage) When performing a backtest, traders often overlook critical transaction costs such as fees, slippages and spreads. These seemingly small costs can accumulate and significantly erode profits, especially strategies that rely on frequent trades with a low average return per trade. Slippage also should include execution slippage - the time delay between receiving a signal from a system, placing an order and its execution. This is particularly problematic for lower timeframe trading where even minor delays can drastically swing a strategy from profitable to unprofitable Example: A day trader runs a backtest on a scalping strategy and sees parabolic returns. However in live trading, the small profits from each trade are wiped out by broker commissions, spreads and the slippage that occurs from both position sizing, and when trades are executed slightly later than expected. This strategy, while successful in the backtest, failed to account for the ‘death by a thousand paper cuts.’ 10. Filling Half of the Grocery Cart (Partial Order Fills) In low liquidity environments, or when trading large position sizes, partial order fills are common - meaning traders only get a portion of their order executed at their desired price. This can significantly impact returns. Backtests will usually assume complete fills at the exact target price. However, in reality a trader experiencing a partial order fill must decide whether to complete the position at a worse price or leave a portion of the target position size out of the market. Both choices will lead to results that are not comparable to the backtested results. Example: A trader places a limit order to buy 100 shares of a low-liquidity stock at a price of $10. The order is only partially filled, with 60 shares bought at $10, while the remaining 40 shares require the new, higher price. The trader now faces the choice of paying more, or leaving part of the trade out. This is a major deviation from the backtest, which assumed the complete position was bought at $10. 11. Betting on Lightning Striking Twice (Black Swan Events) Black swan events are rare, inherently unpredictable, and have a significant impact on financial markets. Strategies designed to avoid drawdowns during these events are at risk of being overfit. Traders often fall into the trap of building systems that avoid drawdowns during past black swan events - overfitting their strategies to these rare occurrences. These strategies are unlikely to succeed in regular market conditions and contain no extra edge in protecting a trader from future black swans events. Example: After the FTX collapse caused a sharp drop in crypto prices, a trader chooses to develop a swing trading strategy designed to avoid all losses during this event. However, by optimizing the strategy to exit positions before the collapse, the trader unintentionally overfits it. As a result, the strategy begins to sell off positions too early in other situations, cutting profits short. Prior to the FTX collapse, the market was still in an uptrend, and there were no clear signs of an impending downturn - so attempting to optimize for such a rare event ends up compromising the strategy’s performance in more typical market conditions. 12. Expecting a Weeks Pay After Only Working One Shift (Time of Day and Day of Week Restrictions) Many traders are only able to trade during specific hours or days of the week, yet their backtests often include data from periods where they are unavailable - such as overnight sessions. This creates an unrealistic expectation of returns. For example, in markets like crypto that trade 24/7, backtesting a day trading strategy on the full market period gives a false impression of potential profits if you can only trade during certain hours. Additionally, market participants also differ depending on the time of day, as entire countries wake up and go to sleep at different times of day. One could make the assumption that human behavior as a whole might be the same, but the number of participants and liquidity will definitely change. Example: A day trader backtests a strategy using 24/7 crypto market data - but is only able to trade on weekday afternoons due to other commitments. 13. Siphoning Gas from a Moving Car (Capital Drain and Addition) Backtests frequently assume infinite compounding, where no capital is ever added or withdrawn from the trading account. In practice, however, traders will regularly add or remove funds - which significantly impacts the performance of a strategy. For instance, withdrawing money during a drawdown forces the strategy to work harder to recover losses, as it now requires higher returns to break even. Similarly, adding capital can skew results by altering position sizing. While it is necessary to manage capital in this way, backtests usually don’t account for these changes and once again, leads to results that are not repeated in practice. Example: A trader consistently pulls a portion of profits from their account each month. In the backtest, no withdrawals are considered, and the strategy appears highly profitable. However, in live trading these regular withdrawals put pressure on the account, and especially over longer periods of time, this reduced level of compound will lead to significant underperformance relative to the backtest due to the reduced compounding effect on returns. 14. Your Subscription Service Increase Price Without You Realizing (Interest Rates and Funding Costs) The ‘cost of capital’ - such as leverage costs, interest rate and funding fees - can fluctuate over time, but backtests often overlook these dynamic costs or even fail to account for them altogether. In live markets, these changes can significantly erode profit margins. Not considering these costs, especially the factors affecting their variability, can easily turn a profitable backtest into an unprofitable strategy in live trading. Example: A trader backtests a strategy for use in cryptocurrency perpetual futures. The strategy is designed for bull markets but fails to account for the rising funding rates frequently seen during periods of high demand. As the cost to maintain an open position skyrockets, the trader’s profit margins quickly shrink, making the strategy far less viable than the backtest indicated. This is particularly dangerous because as the funding fees erode the position’s margin, the liquidation price rises faster than expected, potentially resulting in the entire position being liquidated - even though the trade appeared profitable on paper. 15. You Can’t Ride the Wave Past the Shore (Alpha Decay) In highly competitive markets, especially in high-frequency trading, the edge of a strategy (alpha) can erode over time as more participants exploit similar inefficiencies. This gradual loss of profitability - known as alpha decay - often isn’t captured in backtesting, which assumes static market conditions. Alpha decay is particularly relevant in high-frequency trading, where competition and frontrunning are more intense, while it tends to be less of an issue in higher time-frame swing trading. 16. Playing Chess Against Yourself and Expecting to Win Every Time (Psychological Factors) Psychological biases still affect fully systematic traders. The assumption that traders will follow their strategy without hesitation or emotional interference rarely holds true in live trading, especially during periods of drawdown or high volatility. Manual and automated traders alike feel the same compulsion after experiencing drawdown. The temptation to tweak or abandon a strategy during this period is strong and often leads to the worst decision. It is well documented anecdotally that many traders find that after modifying a ‘losing’ strategy, the new version performs worse than the original, as it has been adjusted to avoid the losses of the past and misses future gains by virtue of overfitting. Example: An algorithmic trader watches as their automated strategy experiences a significant drawdown. Panicking, the trader tweaks the parameters in order to avoid further losses. Shortly after, the original strategy would have recovered, but the modified version continues to struggle as the adjustments were made in reaction to short term losses instead of accounting for long term performance. Final Note: Congratulations if you made it this far! This might not be the most exciting topic, but it’s essential knowledge for every trader and investor. This article was written to warn you of the dangers of relying on backtests - and provides a checklist of common pitfalls to watch out for. Whether you’re running your own backtest or reviewing someone else’s, it’s critical to look beyond the shiny numbers and assess the real-world viability. What looks great on paper may not hold up in the real world. Best of luck in the markets - but remember: stay prudent, and you’ll make your own luck!
INDEX:BTCUSDEducation
by QuantraSystems
4
Creating a Balanced Investment PortfolioCreating a Balanced Investment Portfolio In the vast realm of trading, where platforms like FXOpen play a pivotal role, strategy and skill stand paramount. As the age-old adage goes, 'Don't put all your eggs in one basket.' In the context of trading, this underscores the significance of diversification. Enter the concept of a balanced investment portfolio - an excellent balanced portfolio example, which emerges as an oasis of hope amidst the unpredictable dunes of market volatility. Understanding the Importance of a Balanced Investment Portfolio To achieve a balanced investment portfolio, it's crucial to consider the balance of individual components, especially forex, CFDs, stocks, and bonds. For example, a stock portfolio balance refers to the proportion of stocks in relation to other investment types. This balance is pivotal, as stocks often carry higher risks but also higher potential rewards. By understanding their own risk tolerance and learning how to balance portfolio assets effectively, traders can determine the ideal portfolio balance that meets their specific objectives. Building the Foundation: Investment Basics Every experienced trader knows that the world of investments is vast, presenting myriad opportunities. Some of the primary investment types include: - Stocks: These signify ownership in a company and constitute a claim on a fraction of its assets and earnings. - Bonds: Essentially, when you invest in bonds, you're loaning your money, either to a corporation or the government, in exchange for periodic interest payments plus the return of the bond's face value when it matures. - Real Estate: Investing in tangible land, buildings, or housing. Given its physical nature, it often acts as a hedge against more volatile markets. - Mutual Funds: These funds pool money from several investors to invest in a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other securities. Central to investment basics is the risk-return tradeoff. Essentially, it highlights that the potential return on any investment is directly proportional to the risk associated with it. In this matrix, diversification emerges as the most effective strategy, helping to spread and, in turn, mitigate risk. Asset Allocation Strategies Asset allocation might seem like a complex term, but at its core, it's about ensuring that your portfolio reflects your investment portfolio balance, harmonising your desired risk and reward. 1. Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) Introduced by the visionary economist Harry Markowitz in the 1950s, the Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) has since established itself as a seminal concept in portfolio management. Groundbreaking for its time and still influential today, MPT hinges on a principle that feels intuitive yet was revolutionary upon its debut: diversifying investments to maximise returns while judiciously managing the associated market risk. Central to the MPT is the construct of the 'Efficient Frontier'. This captivating concept represents a boundary in the risk-return space where portfolios lie if they offer the highest expected return for any given level of risk. In essence, any portfolio residing on the Efficient Frontier is deemed optimal, reflecting a balance where no additional expected return can be achieved without accepting more risk. 2. Strategic Asset Allocation Here, traders establish a base policy mix — a proportional combination of assets based on expected rates of return for each asset class. It’s a long-haul game, adjusting the portfolio as long-term goals or risk tolerance evolve. 3. Tactical Asset Allocation A more active management portfolio strategy, this method tries to exploit short-term market conditions. It involves shifting percentage holdings in different categories to take advantage of market pricing anomalies or strong market sectors. Diversification In the complex world of investing, understanding how to balance a portfolio is key. Diversification is the guardian against unpredictability. It is the art of spreading investments across various assets or sectors, ensuring that potential adverse events in one area won't unravel the entire portfolio's performance. Essentially, diversification is the protective shield that buffers against market volatility, offering a more stable and consistent growth path for traders. Geographical Diversification Globalisation has knit economies closer than ever before, yet each retains unique characteristics influenced by internal and external events. By diversifying investments across continents and countries, traders can leverage these unique attributes. Sector Diversification Beyond geography, the global market is segmented into various sectors — technology, healthcare, and finance, to name a few. Each has its growth trajectory, impacted by different factors. Spreading investments across sectors can hedge against unforeseen adversities. Individual Asset Selection The keystone of a robust portfolio is the judicious choice of individual assets. Beyond the broad strokes of diversification, the meticulous selection of each asset determines the portfolio's potential success. It's where profound understanding meets strategic decision-making, ensuring that every asset, be it a stock, bond, or commodity, is handpicked to serve the trader's overarching goals and vision. Proper research, encompassing financial performance, management quality, growth potential, and market trends, provides insight, reducing the chances of unwelcome surprises. Risk assessment is another crucial part of individual asset selection. Risk is an inherent part of investing. However, with rigorous risk assessment, traders can anticipate potential pitfalls. Evaluating the risk associated with each asset and its correlation with others in the portfolio helps in achieving the desired balance. Monitoring and Rebalancing In the dynamic dance of markets, continuous oversight and timely adjustments keep a portfolio's rhythm and harmony intact. - Regular Portfolio Review. The world doesn't stand still, nor do the markets. Regular reviews ensure that the portfolio aligns with the trader's goals and market realities. - Rebalancing Strategies. Over a period of time, certain investments will experience more rapid growth than others. This can shift the portfolio’s balance, necessitating rebalancing. Rebalancing, whether by reinvesting dividends or selling assets that have appreciated to buy those that have declined, ensures alignment with the desired risk levels and asset allocation strategy. Conclusion Crafting a balanced trading portfolio is an art backed by science, strategy, and due diligence. It's an ongoing process requiring constant monitoring and fine-tuning. By keeping a finger on the pulse of global trends, understanding risks, and staying committed to their goals, traders can navigate the choppy waters of global markets effectively. For those eager to embark on or deepen their trading journey, FXOpen offers the platform and tools. To initiate this exciting endeavour, you can open an FXOpen account and explore the dynamic offerings of the TickTrader platform. This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.
NASDAQ:TSLAEducation
by FXOpen
5
How Different Personality Traits Affect Trading StylesIn trading, the psychology behind decisions is just as important as technical analysis and market knowledge. Traders’ personalities play a massive role in shaping their approaches, risk tolerance, and overall strategies. Understanding how these traits influence one’s trading style is crucial for developing a personalized and effective approach. 1️⃣ The Analytical Trader: Data-Driven Decision Makers Analytical traders rely heavily on data, numbers, and patterns. They often gravitate toward strategies that involve technical analysis, algorithmic trading, and quantitative models. Analytical traders enjoy dissecting historical price data, examining chart patterns, and using indicators. However, their reliance on data may lead to overanalysis or "paralysis by analysis." For such traders, developing a systematic trading plan with clear entry and exit points helps them stay disciplined and avoid second-guessing themselves. This personality type fits well with high-frequency trading (HFT) or day trading where precision matters, but must avoid getting bogged down by too much information. 2️⃣ The Intuitive Trader: Trusting Gut Feelings Intuitive traders often use their "gut" or feel for the market, relying less on formal data and more on experience, sentiment, and instinct. They tend to have a strong understanding of market sentiment and can react quickly to changes in market conditions. These traders often excel in volatile environments where quick decisions and flexibility are necessary. However, over-reliance on intuition can lead to impulsive trading decisions. To mitigate this risk, intuitive traders benefit from pairing their instincts with some level of data analysis to confirm their hunches. Well known traders like George Soros have been known to employ intuition, but it’s often combined with deep market understanding. 3️⃣ The Risk-Taker: Bold and Aggressive in the Market Risk-takers are naturally inclined to make bold trades, often with higher risk and reward. They thrive on the excitement of taking chances, particularly in high-volatility markets. These traders tend to favor leveraged products such as options, futures, or forex due to the potential for high returns. Their strategy might involve buying into breakout stocks or currencies during key events like earnings reports or economic data releases. But aggressive traders must also be cautious. Without proper risk management, they may face significant drawdowns. Using tight damage control and/or stop-loss orders, employing position sizing, and ensuring they never over-leverage can help them stay on track while pursuing high-risk trades. 4️⃣ The Conservative Trader: Slow and Steady Approach The conservative trader prioritizes capital preservation over quick gains. They tend to avoid high-risk trades and favor strategies with more stable, long-term potential. Typically, these traders invest in blue-chip stocks, government bonds, or established commodities. They favor strategies like dollar-cost averaging and long-term trend-following. While conservative traders are less likely to face catastrophic losses, they also run the risk of missing out on high-reward opportunities. To improve their returns, they may incorporate a small portion of high-growth or higher-risk assets into their portfolios, all while keeping their overall risk profile low. 5️⃣ The Impulsive Trader: Reacting to Every Market Move Impulsive traders are constantly chasing the next big opportunity, quickly jumping in and out of trades. They are often highly influenced by market noise, news, and social media. While their agility can sometimes pay off in rapidly changing markets, they are prone to over-trading, which can quickly erode profits due to transaction costs and poor decision-making under pressure. To counteract impulsiveness, these traders need to develop clear trading rules and maintain strict discipline, often using automated trading systems to remove emotion from their decisions. Incorporating a cooling-off period before entering a trade can also help them avoid rash decisions. 6️⃣ The Methodical Trader: Discipline and Structure Above All Methodical traders thrive on discipline, rules, and structure. They carefully plan every trade in advance, ensuring they know their entry points, exit points, and DC levels. Their strategies are usually back-tested, and they stick to them rigorously, rarely deviating from their plan. This makes them adept at long-term investing or swing trading, where patience and strategy execution matter more than quick decisions. This trader type excels in systematic strategies, like those seen in trend-following systems such as the Turtle Trading method, but they must be cautious not to become too rigid. In fast-moving markets, being too slow to adapt can cause missed opportunities or late defensive reactions. 7️⃣ The Emotional Trader: Overcoming Psychological Biases Emotional traders often find it challenging to manage stress and anxiety during market fluctuations. Their decisions can be driven by fear, greed, or hope, leading to poor judgment, such as holding losing positions for too long or taking profits prematurely. Behavioral finance identifies this as a common issue among traders, often exacerbated by biases like loss aversion. To manage these tendencies, emotional traders benefit from mindfulness techniques, journaling, and setting strict damage control/stop-loss levels to limit the influence of emotions. They may also implement mechanical systems that reduce the emotional component of trading, focusing on sticking to their rules rather than being swayed by market swings. Understanding your personality type as a trader allows for a better alignment of your strategy with your natural tendencies. Each type has its strengths and weaknesses, and by recognizing these, traders can develop systems and approaches that complement their unique traits, ultimately leading to better performance in the markets.
Education
by AlexSoro
1
How I stopped strategy hopping by creating my own strategyIn the fast-paced world of trading, many of us, especially when beginning our journey, we find ourselves caught in a relentless cycle of strategy hopping. We jump from one strategy to another, lured by the promise of quick profits. However, this constant shifting often leads to frustration, a sense of not making any progress, and most importantly, a lack of consistent results. I experienced this firsthand as I back-tested, forward-tested, and executed various trading systems, on demo and live accounts, each time hoping for better outcomes but always ending up not meeting expectations and feeling more or less stuck in the same position of having to find a profitable trading strategy. Eventually, after having tried many different systems that I found online, I decided to finally try to create my own and this time stick to a single system for a prolonged period of time. This idea/publication explores my journey on how I created this simple trading strategy and how I used my engineering background to create a semi automated-trading system around it. And just to clarify, this is not financial advice, this should serve as an idea. If you want to try this out, do so at your own risk, after understanding the concept and after testing. I’m still testing this myself, but in theory it’s sound, and so far in my forward-testing is performing very well! Scalping, Day trading, Swing trading, Fibonacci levels, Support/Resistance levels, round psychological levels, Bollinger bands, EMAs, RSI, MACD, ICT, Smart money concepts, algo-trading, forex, crypto, indices, metals, multi-timeframe analysis, etc, etc. I’ve traded in these timeframes: D, 8h, 4h, 2h, 1h, 30m, 15m, 5m, 1m, and I’ve explored quite a few different strategies based on the concepts I just dumped above so I don’t bore you with every single case, and so based on that experience I’m taking a few considerations before creating my strategy. First, I’ll be trading forex, metals, and maybe crypto and indices. Personal choice. But there’s no reason this shouldn’t work in any other market. Second, I personally need to be more consistent on when it comes to analyzing the charts. So, for now let’s say that I’ll “log-in” every day, Monday-Friday, some amount of time during NY session. Third, I’ve learned that multi-timeframe analysis is better than analyzing only one specific timeframe, so I’ll include that. Next, I know there are different approaches, but from my perspective the market is either trending or not trending (aka consolidating; bouncing between two levels, imperfectly). I guess it’d be great to have one strategy for trending markets and one for markets that are in consolidation, but for now I’m specifically picking a trend-following strategy. I found that following the trend can be very rewarding, especially when you catch it from the start or near it and are able to exit right before it ends (that’s the tricky part, but we’re only talking theory for now). So a totally reasonable idea would be to try to enter the market on pull-backs, while expecting the price to continue in the direction of the main trend. So a Fibonacci retracement tool sounds ideal for this method. I’d like to somehow incorporate algo-trading up to some extent. I have a software engineering background, so it comes natural for me to try to create or adjust an existing trading bot to execute operations for me. But the issue I always had was creating a trading bot to spot good opportunities. It is just not easy to achieve, for any trading strategy. And that is because of the constantly changing nature of the markets. It requires subjectivity by a human to some extent when it comes to reading, understanding the market and predicting a direction. 💡 So with that said, now, two very important ideas I realized that this system exploits. 1. You don’t need to know exactly up to where price is going to retrace to on the Fibonacci tool. You can bet on more than one level. 2. You don’t need to create a trading bot that “fully” automates trading. It can only handle the part of managing the position(s). Let me explain. With the Fibonacci Retracement tool the trader is free to choose however many levels they want to visualize. And that is great, but it’s not easy to predict accurately and consistently up to which level price is going to retrace. We might miss some trades if we bet on a bigger pull-back and price continues on the trend without hitting our entry, or, we might experience some losses if we bet on a smaller pull-back and price decides to retrace more, and then continue on the same trend direction (which is even more painful to see lol). So the idea here is to place more than one order based on a few different fib levels. Managing more than one position can be challenging, but that’s when the next idea comes into play. “Semi” automating the strategy with the help of a trading bot. As I mentioned previously, at least for me it has been difficult to create a trading bot that can reliably match the trading opportunities that I would find. Sometimes the bot would find good opportunities, but some other times it would find opportunities that wouldn’t make sense to take because of other reasons (price close to some Support/Resistance level, news, different direction on higher timeframes, etc) and if all of those reasons were taken into account that would increase the complexity of the code and most of the time the actual opportunities found by the bot would decrease (including the good ones!). So it’s a trade-off. On the other hand, managing the position(s) is totally doable for a trading bot. Managing one or more open positions or pending orders is done after confirming a trading opportunity, so a trading bot can do precisely what a human would do based on the same conditions. And creating that kind of bot is not that complicated to achieve. So with all of that in mind I started writing some rules for the trading strategy. Timeframe for entries: 15m Multi-timeframe analysis: D, 4h, 1h, 15m I’ll be spotting opportunities around NY session open I’ll need a trading bot to manage the positions for me so I don’t stare at the charts for too long (not because I don’t want to, but because apart from having other things to do it wouldn’t improve the outcome! + that the trading bot is much better at handling its emotions :wink) I’ll focus on EIGHTCAP:XAUUSD first and maybe later I’ll apply this strategy to other markets. Let’s focus for a bit on the fib tool and the positions for now. The screenshot below shows the levels that I’m using. And for now I’m just betting on 3 positions. Again, managing more than one position can be tricky, but I’m relying on the fact that a trading-bot can help us in this part which is easy for the bot to handle. And apart from that we only have one position open at a time so it’s not actually that hard as it might sound if we don’t want to use a trading bot. Of course no system is perfect, so losses are expected. But I’m positioning myself in a way that my wins will cover my losses and give me good profit. In consequence, risk management is very important. With every bet or fibonacci tool I place and open X positions (in this case 3) I want to make sure that in total I’m not risking more than 0.5% of my total account balance. This part depends on the trader, some traders can tolerate bigger draw-downs, and so they can risk more % per position, others risk less, I personally like 0.5% for now. At the time of writing this I’m testing with the following risks: Position 1 (2.3R if TP hit): 0.10% of the account balance Position 2 (3.6R if TP hit): 0.18% of the account balance Position 3 (4.2R if TP hit): 0.22% of the account balance With those positions placed these things can happen: 1. Price doesn’t retrace enough to trigger any of the pending orders and continues in the same direction of the trend. In that case, when there’s a new higher high or lower low we just cancel our pending orders and analyze again to spot new opportunities. 2. Price retraces enough to hit all of our SL resulting in a loss of the 3 positions (-0.50%) 3. Only Position 1 gets triggered and we go to TP (2.3R * 0.10% = 0.23% gain) 4. Position 2 gets triggered and we go to TP (-0.10% + 3.6R * 0.18% = 0.55% gain) 5. Position 3 gets triggered and we go to TP (-0.10% - 0.18% + 4.2R * 0.22% = 0.64% gain) Nothing to do with alternatives 1 & 2 as it’s normal for us to lose or miss an opportunity sometimes. With alternative 3 we have a small gain. And with alternatives 4 & 5 we have a slightly better gain than our total risk of 0.50%. Now all of that might not sound ver impressive and it’s because this follows the fixed position way of managing the positions. Trailing the SL many times can produce much better returns when managed properly. But more on that later. Possible winning example below using ATR trailing SL. But let’s stick to the fixed positions for now to understand and get used to the system first and then you can let the bot do the management with the trailing SL method. Now why those specific risk %s for those 3 positions? The reasoning is that in my recent trading I’ve noticed that price tends to retrace enough to trigger either my Position 2 or my Position 3 more often than triggering only my Position 2. So it makes more sense to me to add slightly higher risk on those to increase profit. However, in my experience, in the higher timeframes price retraces even to the 38.2% level to then continue in the same trend direction more often than on the lower timeframes. But this part as I said depends on the trader, if you decide to incorporate this strategy/system to your trading you are free to choose different risk % per positions. Additionally, you could even open more positions (again, relying on the trading bot for position management), and of course following a good risk management plan by adjusting the risk for all positions and sticking to a total of less than 2% risk per fib tool placement. But this also depends on the trader. Sometimes price does like to ‘grab liquidity’ by retracing slightly more than the 100% level, hitting my last SL, and then continue on the trend direction we placed our bet on. However, I think that 3 positions is enough, at least for me, specially in the lower timeframes. Let’s focus on the trading bot for a bit now. As I said the bot should only manage my positions so I need a way to turn it on when I spot a good opportunity and then let it run until the position hits SL or TP, or it gets closed because of another reason. In this case I developed two systems. One is with fixed SL and TP, and one is with managing the position(s) with a trailing SL. The trailing SL is based on the current ATR value, but this could be expanded even further to another method of trailing SL based on specific levels the user provides (e.g. when in 1.4R move SL to break-even, when in 2R move SL to 1R, etc). For now I tested with fixed positions and with ATR trailing SL and they both work great and are profitable. The rules can be extended even more, for instance you choose the ATR trailing SL method and still place TP on the -27% or on the -61.8% fib levels so positions fully close on those levels, or you could close partially let’s say 30% when TP1 is hit (0% fib level) and then keep trailing, etc. There are many variations, and those can be handled by the bot based on the initial configuration. So on how the actual trading bot works. I developed a PineScript strategy that fires alerts that I can use with a service like PineScript to execute the operations but I found that those services most of the time don’t allow managing multiple positions at once and have other complications. So I created my own webhook server that receives the alerts and I also developed an EA that receives that information and executes the operations but this is still in testing phase and is not ready for use unless you have advanced technical knowledge. I’m thinking of ways to make this available however and would love some thoughts/feedback/suggestions! This strategy can still be applied even without a trading bot. However the trading bot would make the system much better and allow for more time to maybe analyze different markets and take on more trading opportunities, or just focus on other stuff. So to put all of this together now we’re only missing the part of spotting the opportunities. There are different ways, I personally just look for trends. I rely on simple price action (for uptrend I want to see clear higher highs and higher lows, and for downtrend I want to see clear lower lows and lower highs), a smoothed Heikin-Ashi EMA, and sometimes on the ADX indicator to see how strong the trend is. In the example below I show my thought process while applying this strategy on a forward-testing phase. This is exactly how I saw the chart when I logged-in for my trading session a few days ago. In the higher timeframes I checked that there is room for price to keep going up, that means that there shouldn’t be a S/R level or round psychological level near price. Having also analyzed higher timeframes and seen that it makes sense for price to continue this uptrend I decided to place my fib tool. I usually consider wicks too. So I place the first fib limit on the higher low, and the second fib limit on the higher high. Having placed the fib tool and created the pending orders now we need to wait for price to trigger our positions. But sometimes price is not done and keeps going up, invalidating our higher high (or lower low on a downtrend). When that happens we just need to stay focused on when price closes to see if a new higher high has been formed. If that happens we simply update our fib tool placement, and update the pending orders (entry, SL, & TP). This is a condition that the trading bot can probably handle. Eventually price will make it clear where the higher high is, and we finally see a retracement. And now we wait… but still focused in case we need to adjust our fib tool and pending orders if price is not yet retracing. Price drops with a strong move. Now we just step away, we already have the positions placed with SL and TP. We did our analysis, and so we don’t need to look at the charts and let any negative emotions gain control. At this point with fixed positions we can just close the charts and give an end to this trading session. And if using the trailing SL method we just leave it to the trading bot to manage the positions. In this case I was just testing the fixed positions and it unfolded into a win for the 3rd position. So overall about a 0.64% gain (the best alternative). So this is it. This covers the base of this strategy and my thought process while creating the rules for this system. It can be adjusted to different timezones as well, different markets depending on the asset type, etc. I’ve been forward-testing this strategy and system for a few weeks so far and it seems very promising. And I couldn’t wait any longer to share this idea in hopes that you can learn at least something from everything I shared. I’d also love to hear if anyone would be interested in using a system like this with the actual trading bot, so I can plan best on how to make it accessible to other users that don’t have technical/engineering knowledge. In conclusion, I shared my journey from strategy hopping to creating my own trading strategy based on my own needs. By exploring the key ideas of leveraging the Fibonacci retracement tool to bet on multiple positions and embracing a semi-automated approach, I’ve developed a system that aligns with my trading style and allows for necessary flexibility in response to market changes. If you find yourself caught in the cycle of strategy hopping, or don’t see the results you expected (be reasonable though!) I urge you to reflect on what you truly want from your trading experience. Consider creating your own strategy that aligns with your objectives and trading style! And feel free to take ideas from this article to build your own system. Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. I’d love to hear it, any thoughts/feedback or suggestions are appreciated. Looking forward to the discussion. Thanks, and good luck!
EIGHTCAP:XAUUSDEducation
by alfred343
8
BOS - Break of StructureBOS means Break of Structure . It happens when the price of an asset (like a stock or currency) breaks past a key support or resistance level, indicating a potential change in the market direction. Key points: Uptrend BOS: If the price breaks above a recent high, it could mean the start of an upward trend. Downtrend BOS: If the price breaks below a recent low, it may signal the beginning of a downward trend. Traders use BOS to spot potential trend changes and decide when to buy or sell.
TVC:SILVEREducation
by CTA_tradesmart
Reacting to Change Part 1: Consolidation PhasesWelcome to our 2-part series on adapting to change in trading, where we dive into the art of staying flexible in dynamic market environments. In Part 1, we’ll explore how traders can effectively navigate consolidation phases and avoid the pitfalls of rigid analysis. The Trap of Over-Defining Consolidation: Price Action is Fluid, Not Fixed One of the biggest challenges in trading is dealing with consolidation phases—those times when the market enters a short-term equilibrium, leading to a high degree of random price action. During these phases, it’s tempting to box price movements into neatly defined patterns like triangles or channels. While this can offer an initial framework, the reality is that consolidation patterns are constantly evolving. Trying to over-define these phases or stick rigidly to a single pattern often leads to frustration and missed opportunities. In consolidation, price action is fluid, not fixed. What starts as a symmetrical triangle might morph into a flag, or a sideways range may develop into a wedge. These shifts are common because consolidation phases by definition are periods of indecision, where neither buyers nor sellers dominate, causing price to "walk" in a seemingly random manner. When we try to force the market into the confines of a rigid pattern, we risk missing these subtle changes and become despondent when the market doesn’t behave as expected. Instead, successful traders stay adaptive. Don’t be afraid to re-draw the boundaries of a consolidation phase as new information emerges. You can begin with an initial hypothesis based on a recognisable price pattern, but it’s essential to remain open to the possibility that this pattern might evolve or even fail entirely. Flexibility allows you to adjust your parameters to reflect what the market is telling you rather than clinging to a fixed idea. By embracing the fluid nature of consolidation phases and adjusting your approach as price action unfolds, you stay aligned with the market, increasing your chances of catching the eventual breakout or breakdown. Real-World Example: FTSE 100 In this example, the FTSE 100 moves from a small initial consolidation phase into a sideways range with failures at the top and bottom, before eventually breaking out. Those who failed to adapt to the changing consolidation structure may have been caught out with false breakouts and missed the eventual breakout. FTSE100 Daily Candle Chart: Phase 1 Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Phase 2 Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Phase 3 Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Breakout Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Combine Flexibility with Core Principles While flexibility is key, it’s essential to combine it with a solid foundation of core principles. Flexibility without a framework can lead to erratic decisions, but by grounding your adaptability in a few guiding rules, you’ll better navigate consolidation phases. 1. Aligning with the Dominant Trend: Consolidation phases have a tendency to resolve in line with the dominant trend. Hence, the first step is to define the dominant trend, which varies depending on your trading timeframe. Whether you're using moving averages or trendlines, having a clear sense of the overarching market direction can guide your expectations for a breakout. 2. Defining a Breakout: A breakout from consolidation is more than just price moving outside a range. Look for an expansion in trading ranges, backed by an increase in volume. The combination of these factors helps confirm that the market is truly breaking out, not just teasing false moves. 3. Watch for Changes in Volatility: Volatility often contracts during consolidation phases. One of the best indicators of an impending breakout is when volatility begins to contract. Pay attention to tightening price ranges and be on alert when those ranges start to widen. Real-World Example: Nvidia (NVDA) In this example we see the importance of using core principles to as a framework for flexibility. The 50 day moving average (MA) and 200MA clearly show the dominant trend is bullish. This is important during Phase 3 (below) in which the market appears to break lower. In Phase 4 we see clear volatility compression at the top end of the consolidation range – a clear indicator of an impending breakout. NVDA Daily Candle Chart: Phase 1 Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Phase 2 Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Phase 3 Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Phase 4 Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Breakout Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results Avoiding Despondency Through Flexibility Expecting a breakout or breakdown that never materialises can lead to frustration, especially if you’re locked into a rigid view of the market. By combining flexibility with your core principles, you’ll be better prepared to react when the market shifts—and avoid becoming despondent in the process. The secret to successfully navigating consolidation phases isn’t about predicting the next move—it’s about reacting to change while being guided by solid principles. Patterns evolve, and so must your approach. By balancing flexibility with core rules around trend direction, breakouts, and volatility, you can capitalise when the market finally resolves its range. In Part 2 of our series, we’ll explore how adapting to trend changes is just as crucial as navigating consolidations, and why flexibility is a trader’s most valuable asset in any market condition. Disclaimer: This is for information and learning purposes only. The information provided does not constitute investment advice nor take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of any investor. Any information that may be provided relating to past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results or performance. Social media channels are not relevant for UK residents. Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 83.51% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
NASDAQ:NVDAEducation
by Capitalcom
EMOTIONS! Chapter-2In trading, emotions can easily become your biggest enemy, and it's crucial to understand that “you are your own opponent.” The market isn’t against you—it’s neutral, driven by global forces like supply and demand, economic policies, and geopolitical events. It doesn’t care whether you win or lose. The real battle is internal, and your success depends on your ability to manage your emotional responses. Emotions like fear, greed, frustration, and overconfidence are powerful forces that, if left unchecked, can lead to impulsive decisions and costly mistakes. The key to thriving in the forex market is learning how to control those emotions, because if you don’t, they will control you. I learned this lesson the hard way back in 2016. At the time, I had just started gaining confidence after a string of successful trades. That confidence quickly turned into greed. I started taking bigger risks, convinced that I was riding a winning streak. Then, things turned. The market shifted, and I began losing trades. Instead of stepping back and re-evaluating, I panicked. I felt this urgent need to recover my losses, so I started chasing the market. Every time I saw an opportunity, I jumped on it without thinking, trading out of desperation rather than strategy. I kept telling myself I could make it all back with just one more trade, but the more I tried, the deeper I sank into losses. It felt like the market was conspiring against me, but the truth was, I was sabotaging myself. I was letting my emotions dictate my decisions, and that was the real problem. Fear took over when I lost, and greed controlled me when I won. I wasn’t sticking to my trading plan, and I wasn’t thinking rationally. Instead of approaching the market with a clear, calm mindset, I was reacting emotionally to every price movement. It was a vicious cycle—each loss made me more desperate to win, and each win made me more overconfident. I was chasing quick fixes, but in reality, I was only digging a deeper hole. That experience was a painful reminder that in forex trading, the market isn’t there to beat you—it’s neutral. *You beat yourself* by letting emotions cloud your judgment and control your actions. After that tough period in 2016, I knew something had to change. I realized that emotional control was not just a skill—it was a necessity if I wanted to succeed. I had to stop reacting impulsively and start trading with discipline. The first step was getting back to basics: sticking to my trading plan no matter what. I began to follow my risk management rules strictly, using stop-loss orders to protect myself from the emotional urge to "let a trade ride" in the hope of recovery. I also limited the amount of risk I was willing to take on each trade. Instead of chasing profits, I focused on preserving capital and managing risk. One of the biggest changes I made was learning to step away when my emotions were running high. If I felt myself getting anxious, frustrated, or overexcited, I would close my trading platform and take a break. This gave me the space to regain perspective and come back with a clearer mind. I also started keeping a trading journal, documenting not just my trades but also how I felt during them. This helped me recognize emotional patterns—like when I was more prone to making impulsive decisions—and take steps to prevent them. Over time, I developed a deeper understanding of how emotions influence trading. I came to realize that *success in forex isn’t about controlling the market—it’s about controlling yourself.* The market will always be unpredictable, but how you respond to that unpredictability determines your outcome. You can’t let fear make you exit a trade too early, nor can you let greed push you into taking unnecessary risks. By learning to control your emotions, you can make decisions based on logic and strategy rather than impulse. I also learned to embrace patience. Trading is a marathon, not a sprint. The best traders are those who wait for the right opportunities and don’t feel the need to constantly be in the market. Looking back, that difficult year taught me a vital lesson: the market isn’t out to get you; it’s indifferent. You are the only one who can stand in your own way. By mastering your emotions, you can avoid self-sabotage and make rational, calculated decisions that will lead to long-term success. Now, when I trade, I do so with the understanding that my biggest challenge isn’t the market—it’s keeping my emotions in check. Trading with a clear, calm mind has made all the difference, and I know that no matter what the market throws at me, my success or failure depends on how well I manage myself. Happy Trading! -FxPocket
OANDA:XAUUSDEducation
by FxPocket
IMPORTANT Macroeconomics: What is the trade balance?IMPORTANT Macroeconomics: What is the trade balance? The trade balance is an important economic indicator that can have a significant influence on the stock markets. Here is a simple explanation of this concept and its potential impact: What is the trade balance? The trade balance represents the difference between the value of a country's exports and imports over a given period. In other words: - If a country exports more than it imports, its trade balance is in surplus (positive). - If a country imports more than it exports, its trade balance is in deficit (negative). Impact on the stock markets The influence of the trade balance on the stock markets can vary depending on whether it is in surplus or deficit: Trade balance surplus A trade surplus can generally have a positive impact on the stock markets: - It indicates strong competitiveness of domestic companies in international markets. - It can strengthen the value of the national currency, which can attract foreign investors. -Exporting companies may see their shares increase in value. Trade deficit A trade deficit can have a negative impact on stock markets: -It can indicate a weakness in the domestic economy or a loss of competitiveness. -It can weaken the domestic currency, which can discourage foreign investors. -The shares of companies dependent on imports may be negatively affected. Important nuances It is crucial to note that the impact of the trade balance on stock markets is not always direct or predictable: -Overall economic context: Other economic factors can attenuate or amplify the effect of the trade balance. -Investor perception: The reaction of the markets often depends on how investors interpret the trade balance figures in relation to their expectations. -Specific sectors: Some sectors may be more affected than others by changes in the trade balance. In conclusion, although the trade balance is an important indicator, its influence on stock markets must be seen in the broader context of the economy and investor sentiment.
BITSTAMP:BTCUSDEducation
by Le-Loup-de-Zurich
Successful Trading Resembles a CardiogramI once came across a statement that went something like this: “Success is much more like a cardiogram than we realise. There are ups, downs, and periods of stability”. This made me wonder: "Why are the ups, downs, and phases of stability considered normal, rather than constant stability?" The answer was revealing: “If there are ups, downs, and phases of stability, it means you're alive and progressing. If everything is perfectly stable, it means you're stuck and not moving forward”. The process of successful trading within the financial markets closely resembles a cardiogram. From a custom-created graph illustration, each spike could represent an individual trade or even a monthly net total. Through big and small wins, small losses, and inevitable breakeven points, we achieve and maintain consistent long-term profitability. As a trader, this balance is essential. Unfortunately, distortions introduced by firms promising ‘get-rich-quick’ schemes and making unrealistic claims have led many to fall for the illusion of constant winning. In reality, prioritising a sound risk-reward strategy is far more important than focusing solely on win rates. In fact, with a feasible risk management plan, patience, discipline, and a rational approach to the market, one could be wrong half the time and still achieve long-term success. So, the next time you experience a losing streak or face psychological uncertainty, remember that setbacks are part of the journey. Over time, with the right mindset and strategy, everything will fall into place. After all, trading success is a dynamic process - much like the rhythm of a cardiogram.
MARKETSCOM:BITCOINEducation
by Investroy
How to Trade Gap Up and Gap Down Opening? Full Guide What is gap up and gap down in trading? In this article, I will teach you how to trade gap up and gap down opening . You will learn a simple and profitable gap trading strategy that works perfectly on Forex, Gold or any other financial market. First, let's start with a theory . A gap up after the market opening is the situation when the market opens higher than it was closed without any trading activity in between. Above you can see the example a gap up after the market opening on EURGBP. The price level where the market closed is called gap opening level. The price level where the market opened is galled gap closing level. A gap down after the market opening is the situation when the market opens lower than it was closed without trading activity in between. Here is the example of a gap down after the market opening on WTI Crude Oil. Why such gaps occur? There are various reasons why opening gaps occur. One of the most common one is the release of positive or negative news while the market was closed. The market opening price will reflect the impact of such news, causing a formation of the gap. What gap opening means? Gap openings reflect the sudden change in the market sentiment. Gap up will indicate a very bullish sentiment on the market while a gap down will imply very bearish mood of the market participants. However, the markets do not like the gaps. With a very high probability, the gaps are always filled by the market very soon. We say that the gap is filled, when the price returns to the gap opening level. Above, you can see that after some time, EURGBP successfully closed the gap - returned to gap opening level. Such a pattern is very reliable and consistent among different financial markets. For that reason, it can provide profitable trading opportunities for us. You can see that a gap down on WTI Crude Oil was quickly filled and the price returned to the gap opening level. How to trade gap opening? Gap Up Trading Strategy Once you spotted a gap up after the market opening, you should wait for a bearish signal before you sell. You should look for a sign of strength of the sellers. One of the most accurate signals is a formation of a bearish price action pattern: Double top, Triple top, Inverted Cup and Handle, Head and Shoulders, Symmetrical or Descending Triangle, Rising Wedge... Bearish breakout of a trend line / neckline of the pattern will be your signal to sell. Look at a price action on EURGBP before it filled the gap. At some moment, the price formed a double top pattern and broke its neckline. That is our signal to sell. Your stop loss should lie above the highs of the pattern. Take profit - gap opening level. Safest entry is on a retest of a broken neckline/trend line of the pattern. Safest entry point on EURGBP is the retest of a broken neckline of a double top pattern. Stop is lying above its highs. TP - gap opening level. Gap Down Trading Strategy Once you spotted a gap down after the market opening, you should wait for a bullish signal before you sell. You should look for a sign of strength of the buyers. One of the most accurate signals is a formation of a bullish price action pattern: Double bottom, Triple bottom, Cup and Handle, Inverted Head and Shoulders, Symmetrical or Ascending Triangle, Rising Wedge... Bullish breakout of a trend line / neckline of the pattern will be your signal to buy . Let's study the price action on WTI Crude Oil before it filled the gap. You can see that the price formed a cup and handle pattern. Bullish breakout of its neckline is a strong bullish signal. Safest entry is on a retest of a broken neckline/trend line of the pattern. Your stop loss should lie above the lows of the pattern. Take profit - gap opening level. Following this strategy, a nice profit was made. Always remember that probabilities that the gap will be filled are very high. However, it is not clear WHEN exactly it will happen. For that reason, you should carefully analyze a price action and wait for a signal, before you open the trade. That will be your best gap opening trading strategy. ❤️Please, support my work with like, thank you!❤️
Education
by VasilyTrader
10
The British Pound Is Stronger than the US DollarThe British Pound Is Stronger than the US Dollar: Understanding the Reasons GBP/USD is the third most actively traded currency pair on the foreign exchange market, after EUR/USD and USD/JPY. It is also one of the oldest pairs traded on forex. The British pound continues to cost more than the US dollar, despite the dollar overtaking it as the global reserve currency. Why is the British pound stronger than the US dollar? In this FXOpen article, we look at the GBP/USD pair and the factors that keep the British pound strong to help you understand how to trade it. What Is the GBP/USD Pair? Currencies are always traded in pairs on foreign exchange markets. GBP/USD refers to the value of the British pound sterling against the US dollar – specifically, how many US dollars traders need to buy one pound. For example, if the GBP/USD exchange rate is 1.28, a trader would need $1.28 to buy £1. How come the British pound is always stronger than the US dollar? The answer is rooted in history. A Brief History of the GBP/USD Pair Until World War I, the British pound was the global reserve currency, accounting for over 60% of the world’s debt holdings. It was valued at just under $5. After the war, the US dollar began to strengthen, and by 1944, when the Bretton Woods system was introduced, the pound was pegged at $4.03. The Bretton Woods system fixed the US dollar to the gold price and established it as the unofficial global reserve currency. After World War II, the value of the USD began to rise, and it overtook GBP as the primary currency used in international trade. The Bretton Woods system began to slowly collapse after 1971, and both the GBP and USD became free-floating, with the US dropping the gold standard. This has resulted in the value of the GBP gradually sliding over the following decades. The free-float rate made the GBP/USD pair highly volatile. The pound sterling reached a high of 2.08 against the dollar in 2007 during the global financial crisis, as higher UK inflation raised expectations that the Bank of England would raise interest rates. In June 2016, the UK’s vote to leave the European Union drove the value of the pound down to the 1.20–1.25 area overnight. That was its lowest level since the collapse of the exchange rate mechanism in 1985 and the largest one-day decline since the end of Bretton Woods. The GBP/USD pair has since largely traded between 1.20-1.40. A notable exception was the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, when investors flocked to the safe haven US dollar amid uncertainty about the economic impact, and the pound fell to 1.16 against the USD. COVID-19 shutdowns and the loss of European trade following Brexit have weighed on the prospects for the UK economy. At the same time, geopolitical tensions such as the US-China trade war and the Russia-Ukraine conflict have lifted the value of the dollar, as have rising interest rates. In 2022, the Bank of England was forced to intervene as the value of sterling fell close to a record low of 1.035 against the dollar in response to a crisis of confidence in the UK government, high inflation and unemployment rates, and concerns regarding the domestic economy. However, by April 2023, the pound had recovered and became the best-performing G-10 currency of the year. According to Forbes, the British pound is the world’s fifth strongest currency, while the US dollar is the 10th strongest. The GBP/USD pair has primarily been trading around 1.20-1.30 so far in 2023. Why is the pound still stronger than the dollar? Is GBP Stronger than USD? Why is the pound more expensive than the dollar? The value of the GBP against the USD in forex doesn’t solely determine the strength of the US and UK economies. Analysts consider other factors that can question the strength of the pound. Nominal Value A currency’s nominal value refers to its value against another currency in forex. As was mentioned above, the nominal value of both currencies changed significantly over time. Although GBP was always more expensive than the US dollar, this conclusion is relatively arbitrary. Also, it’s worth considering the lower number of British pounds in circulation, which is worth £81 billion, compared to $2.33 trillion US dollars, which contributes to the higher value of GBP as of May 2023. Relative Strength The strength of a particular currency against another at any point in time is also relative, as it could actually be weaker against other currencies. For example, GBP could rise in value against USD but fall against EUR, AUD and JPY, which would suggest that the relative value of the pound is weaker – just not as weak as the USD. This is because the relative strength is determined not only by the value of one currency against another but by economic data, including inflation, economic growth, and the trade balance, which determine the strength of the overall economy. To gauge a currency’s real strength, analysts track its value in relation to multiple currencies over time. For instance, the Dollar Index (DXY) measures the value of the USD against a basket of currencies from its key trading partners and competitors, as this is a more accurate measure of its value than a single pair. Quoting Conventions The use of GBP/USD as the quoting convention reflects the pound’s strength. For instance, a GBP/USD quote of 1.25 signifies that $1.25 is needed to buy £1. This quoting convention originated in the late 1900s during the British Empire when the UK had a larger economy than the US. Despite the subsequent shift in economic power, this convention has endured. Since World War I, the US economy has surpassed the UK economy in terms of size. Modifying quoting conventions is challenging, given how entrenched they are in the financial industry. However, the tradition of quoting GBP/USD in itself does not determine the value of the pound and the dollar. Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) While the GBP/USD trading value suggests the pound is stronger, the purchasing power parity (PPP) fluctuates. PPP indicates how much a currency is worth based on the value of a basket of goods. In these terms, the dollar can be stronger than the pound. The concept underlying PPP is that the exchange rate should equalise the purchasing power of each currency within its respective country. For instance, if a basket of items costs £100 in the UK with a GBP/USD exchange rate of 1.15, the PPP would suggest that the equivalent cost of the same basket in US dollars should be $115. In practice, exchange rates frequently diverge from their PPP levels. The degree to which a currency such as GBP or USD deviates from its PPP indicates its relative strength or weakness against another currency. Global Economy Although the US economy is stronger than that of Great Britain, sterling’s history as the former global reserve currency and political and economic power have contributed to its strength. The pound is one of the world’s oldest currencies, having been introduced in the 1400s. The UK remains a major global financial centre, and the Bank of England continues to participate in international economic developments. What Factors Affect GBP/USD There are several factors that affect the value of the British pound and US dollar: - US Federal Reserve monetary policy - Bank of England monetary policy - Inflation rate, which has a strong impact on the interest rates - Employment data, which influences government fiscal policy - Geopolitical events - Other economic indicators, including retail sales and industrial production Does It Matter If GBP/USD Falls Below Parity? A weaker sterling could support UK exports, but it would also increase the cost of imported goods and drive up inflation. The Bank of England would be forced to intervene to contain inflation. As seen in 2022, there is also a risk that a sharp drop in the pound’s value could become disorderly, which could create political and economic turmoil. However, if the value of the pound fell below the dollar, it would be a psychological milestone for the UK, but it would not have a major impact on the forex market. Conclusion The British pound sterling has traditionally maintained a higher value against the US dollar because of historical convention. However, the US dollar is stronger overall as it is the world's reserve currency and has larger trading volumes. The GBP/USD exchange rate has been in a long downtrend. Therefore, there are risks that GBP will soon lose its nominal premium. Understanding how the British pound is stronger than the US dollar can help you to form strategies to trade the GBP/USD forex pair. By observing economic indicators, you can take a view on how you expect the market to move. If you are looking to trade forex markets, you can open an FXOpen account. The TickTrader platform allows you to analyse live price charts and trade a range of currency pairs. This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.
Education
by FXOpen
11